home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: li.net!usenet
- From: bsilvern@li.net (Bob Silvern)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Borland should be ashamed. My experience with BC5.0.
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 23:10:26 GMT
- Organization: Harmony Graphics
- Message-ID: <4lbquv$r3k@linet06.li.net>
- References: <4l6d1b$219@linet06.li.net> <4l8j3cINNfbr@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: lisuser61.li.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku) wrote:
-
- >Cry me a river...
-
- I paid $350 to "upgrade" to BC5.0, only to find it is inferior to the version I
- was previously using. Please feel free to give as much of your money away to
- Borland as you please, but when I pay money I expect something in return.
-
- >Maybe the use of i is optimized into a register! Did you turn off
- >optimization before you compiled that?
-
- Yes, optimization was turned off. BTW, even if optimization were enabled,
- would it be OK for the debugger to display the incorrect value for a variable?
- I could live with it displaying no value at all, but displaying the wrong value
- I think you would have to consider a bug.
-
- >Not that I'm defending Borland---I couldn't care less. But maybe you are wrong.
-
- Nope.
- Once I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken. :)
-
-
-